Are the references complete and devoid of unnecessary puffery with citations to reputable works in the field?.Are the conclusions consistent with the stated results?.Are the results reasonable given what the reviewer understands from the methods and introduction?.Is the methodology sound? Can it be replicated?.Is the literature review complete? Does the literature review show a bias toward a specific conclusion?.Does the author explain the rationale for undertaking this work (novelty)?.Peer reviewers and editors are tasks with casting a critical eye on these parts: Once the “why” and “how” are explained, the paper lays out the results, discussion points, and conclusions.Įach section of the manuscript listed above helps to tell the story of why the author bothered to do the work, how they did it, and what they learned from it. This introduction is followed by the methodology, arguably one of the most important parts of the paper. They start with a summary, continue with a justification for the work, and a comprehensive review of other work related to the topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |